![]() |
|
![]() |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Thanks for all the ahmm positve encouragement! I may not pursue - but looking at it still. The Greenwoods pushed back 12 inches and made do quite well. I'm pretty far down the track on some of the othe bits - and here are the headers - you'll note the forward tubes are the problem area for the R&P.
[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...] We'll see how it plays out - pics will be included for sure. Cheers - Jim BTW - cool mod on the Spyder. A buddy and I traveled much of northern Spain in a 128 with 2 hot spanish chicks -- not much room - but a heap of fun...
__________________
Rebuilder's Zen Saying: One thought leads to another. If these thoughts link into a chain we become bound to the project. This bondage is subtle and remains until we complete the tasks -- or, STOP Thinking! [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...] |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Another idea would be to move it back just a few inches so that the balancer clears the crossmember and then lower it.. Dry sump oil pan, one of those super small diameter clutch/flywheels and a custom bellhousing. Theres got to be a few inches of room to bring it down without sacrificing ground clearance compared to a wet sump motor.
I would think enough aluminum up front could achieve similar weight bias results to moving the motor back a significant amount. |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]() This gives a good perspective of, 12" back, 5" over, 2" down. Check the a-arms to the front of the engine. Looks like its back to the edge of the windshield.
![]() Last edited by racervette69; 09-23-2012 at 06:44 PM.. |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]() can't keep my eye off that kinsler crossram
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |