mrvette
Phantom of the Opera
Quote:
Originally Posted by car-guy View Post
Fiero your question is wrong ?
It should have said what would we drive if not Obama but McCain/Palin had been elected or Romney would have run the show.
For sure no Corvette ZR1 or Camaro ZL1 because there would have been no GM or UAW...
The republicans would have given all the TARP money to Goldman Sucks...
To big to fail...
Obama did not take your guns either or you are forced to have at least one abortion in your life or get married to your best friend to be a good american...
If Romney is president we are all forced to drive Hyundais and KIAS.
Non union made in the deep south or mexico...
Get it right,Rick...!
Actually it was Bush that started the controversial automotive bailout. It was completed by his successor, Obama.
That was the only thing Bush did that I did not agree with! He should have let GM and Chrysler fail! It was not part of his job description to use taxpayer money to bail out the auto industry.
The bailout, which ultimately totaled $85 billion, was originally begun during the waning days of the Bush administration. With a specific rescue effort rejected by the democratic Congress, the former Commander-in-Chief decided to tap into a separate, $700 billion fund Capitol Hill did approve for the bailout of Wall Street and the banking industry.
It does not matter to me what you think!
I am done with Corvette forum!
And all you crybabies that can’t take it and you know who you are!
You can ban me permanently I do not care!
I am going to blog on web sites that respect the First Amendment rights.
You would think that on corvette forum off topic “politics and religion, Controversy."
Since it is a HOT topic they would make allowances!
Of course STUPID libtards are going to cry! That is what they do!
Attention Corvette forum monitors you might want to read and adapt this.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
I am out of here!
Last edited by Rick Fierro; Today at 08:25 PM. :hissyfit:
Originally Posted by car-guy View Post
Fiero your question is wrong ?
It should have said what would we drive if not Obama but McCain/Palin had been elected or Romney would have run the show.
For sure no Corvette ZR1 or Camaro ZL1 because there would have been no GM or UAW...
The republicans would have given all the TARP money to Goldman Sucks...
To big to fail...
Obama did not take your guns either or you are forced to have at least one abortion in your life or get married to your best friend to be a good american...
If Romney is president we are all forced to drive Hyundais and KIAS.
Non union made in the deep south or mexico...
Get it right,Rick...!
Actually it was Bush that started the controversial automotive bailout. It was completed by his successor, Obama.
That was the only thing Bush did that I did not agree with! He should have let GM and Chrysler fail! It was not part of his job description to use taxpayer money to bail out the auto industry.
The bailout, which ultimately totaled $85 billion, was originally begun during the waning days of the Bush administration. With a specific rescue effort rejected by the democratic Congress, the former Commander-in-Chief decided to tap into a separate, $700 billion fund Capitol Hill did approve for the bailout of Wall Street and the banking industry.
It does not matter to me what you think!
I am done with Corvette forum!
And all you crybabies that can’t take it and you know who you are!
You can ban me permanently I do not care!
I am going to blog on web sites that respect the First Amendment rights.
You would think that on corvette forum off topic “politics and religion, Controversy."
Since it is a HOT topic they would make allowances!
Of course STUPID libtards are going to cry! That is what they do!
Attention Corvette forum monitors you might want to read and adapt this.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
I am out of here!
Last edited by Rick Fierro; Today at 08:25 PM. :hissyfit:
