Sam Cogley
Well-known member
From the well-built installations I've been reading about, there are two options for the tie rods:
1) use a pair of Grand Am right-hand rods, retaining nothing of the original setup.
2) retain the outer tie rod ends, fabricate a longer center bracket for the rack, then use heim joints for the inner connections.
It seems that bump steer is a minimal issue with either setup. #1 has some attraction in that the parts are standard and rather late-model - if something were to break on a road trip, they would be easy to replace. #2 has some attraction in that I have almost-new VB&P HD tie rods with Moog ends in the car.
From a technical standpoint, which version is superior?
Also, does anyone know what size and type the input and output fittings are on the rack? I'll make up an Aeroquip stainless line to run from the high-pressure output of the Hydroboost unit to the rack input, but I'm not sure what the fitting is. Likewise, if I know what the output fitting is I can get a hose barb fitting for the rubber return line.
1) use a pair of Grand Am right-hand rods, retaining nothing of the original setup.
2) retain the outer tie rod ends, fabricate a longer center bracket for the rack, then use heim joints for the inner connections.
It seems that bump steer is a minimal issue with either setup. #1 has some attraction in that the parts are standard and rather late-model - if something were to break on a road trip, they would be easy to replace. #2 has some attraction in that I have almost-new VB&P HD tie rods with Moog ends in the car.
From a technical standpoint, which version is superior?
Also, does anyone know what size and type the input and output fittings are on the rack? I'll make up an Aeroquip stainless line to run from the high-pressure output of the Hydroboost unit to the rack input, but I'm not sure what the fitting is. Likewise, if I know what the output fitting is I can get a hose barb fitting for the rubber return line.
Last edited: