To me just everything was impressive...until I got to the engine specs. If the design is not constrained by any sort of regulations, why build a 5 liter engine to get 1000 to 1400 HP? I think the cars durability and reliability would be enhanced by a bigger engine. 8 liters would, IMO, be much more reasonable. I noticed in the write up, the car handled shifts roughly at street speeds. I think a big displacement engine, with naturally more foot pounds of torque, will make a much more streetable engine and still give you the power you want at high rpm. I notice that on the few high end Ferrari's and Porche's I driven along side of on a city street, they'll be driven by really rev'ing up between gears (frequent gear shifts) just to keep up with normal traffic flow. That's a lot of engine wear. I can keep up with normal street and highway traffic flow in my 08 C6 and never exceed 2000 rpm. (1700 rpm at 70 mph, 580 rwhp at 6500 rpm.)
A more personal and subjective reason for a big displacement engine is just the way they sound. The small displacement engines have to be driven to high engine rev's to produce their HP, its rev's where they take on a shrill screaming sound. I personally like the more P-51 like sound of a big displacement engine. Anyhow, I do realize that the sound I refer to as "shrill, screaming" is probably preferred by many people since it's similar to the sound of a F1 car.