JPhil
Huh?
I am now exploring suspension mods to improve my handling, notably figuring out proper camber change both front and rear. I am reading a lot but still confused about a lot of things.
Yesterday as I reassembled my passenger side rear trailing arm after replacing the wheel bearings, I did a camber change check.

(Tape measure clamped to fender lip to measure wheel center, 18" level fits perfectly against wheel, laser level taped to 18" level shining up to ceiling, floor jack to raise and lower wheel with spring disconnected)
Starting at 15" from fender lip to wheel center, typical ride height, I marked the ceiling where the laser shone. Then jacked up wheel 2" for jounce (which was 1" into bump stop--I have about 1" free jounce movement of trailing arm), marked laser dot on ceiling. Then dropped wheel 2" for rebound and marked ceiling.
Using an angle calculator I came up with 1.3426* negative camber change on jounce and .98465* positive camber change on rebound.
I have a 7/16" thick aluminum spacer between differential and stock strut rod bracket, as per Herb Adams or whoever, and heim joint strut rods.
This camber change seems to be not much, although the car has never broken loose, either front or rear, in a few extreme 'cornering events'.
I did a calculation figuring body roll angle (using track width of 60" for wheels and 2" suspension movement, jounce on one side, rebound on other side) and came up with around 1.9* of body angle change. I don't know if that is the correct way at all, but it gave me an idea of body movement. Seems fairly close for amount of camber change for body roll. Did I figure that correctly, or is that full of bullpucky? Should I have used half the track width to find the roll center length of 30"? That gives me 3.57* of body roll.
OK, that is for the rear end. Next week I get to installing my new front VBP offset front upper A-arms to increase caster. I would like to get my front camber change correct there as well since I know it is off due to using shorter 550lb springs. How should the front and rear compare to be balanced?
Yesterday as I reassembled my passenger side rear trailing arm after replacing the wheel bearings, I did a camber change check.

(Tape measure clamped to fender lip to measure wheel center, 18" level fits perfectly against wheel, laser level taped to 18" level shining up to ceiling, floor jack to raise and lower wheel with spring disconnected)
Starting at 15" from fender lip to wheel center, typical ride height, I marked the ceiling where the laser shone. Then jacked up wheel 2" for jounce (which was 1" into bump stop--I have about 1" free jounce movement of trailing arm), marked laser dot on ceiling. Then dropped wheel 2" for rebound and marked ceiling.
Using an angle calculator I came up with 1.3426* negative camber change on jounce and .98465* positive camber change on rebound.
I have a 7/16" thick aluminum spacer between differential and stock strut rod bracket, as per Herb Adams or whoever, and heim joint strut rods.
This camber change seems to be not much, although the car has never broken loose, either front or rear, in a few extreme 'cornering events'.
I did a calculation figuring body roll angle (using track width of 60" for wheels and 2" suspension movement, jounce on one side, rebound on other side) and came up with around 1.9* of body angle change. I don't know if that is the correct way at all, but it gave me an idea of body movement. Seems fairly close for amount of camber change for body roll. Did I figure that correctly, or is that full of bullpucky? Should I have used half the track width to find the roll center length of 30"? That gives me 3.57* of body roll.
OK, that is for the rear end. Next week I get to installing my new front VBP offset front upper A-arms to increase caster. I would like to get my front camber change correct there as well since I know it is off due to using shorter 550lb springs. How should the front and rear compare to be balanced?
Last edited: