Little mouse that Roared
- Thread starter kwplot34
- Start date
JPhil
Huh?
OK I stand corrected once again.
BRUTAL64
Neanderthal
Don't look at it as a correction, but as a clarification.:idea:
Back in the 80's I had a bunch of 307 blocks and 305 cranks laying around. So, on a whim, I punch out one 307 block to 4 inch bore and threw in a 305 crank with a set of 350 pistons and a fairly big cam. Threw that in a 70 Nova SS and beat the shit out of a number vehicles. I build 5 motors that way.
Disclaimer----Sonic test 307 block first. Of course I didn't on the ones I built.:hunter:
Last edited:
Jsup
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2008
- Messages
- 810
The 454 would be my choice for a truck. How much money do you want to spend ?
A budget stroker assembly would get you 496 cubes...
Me and Budgets don't work well together,I usually blow the budget half way through the build :suicide:
I know that one!
SmokinBBC
Well-known member
The 454 would be my choice for a truck. How much money do you want to spend ?
A budget stroker assembly would get you 496 cubes...
Me and Budgets don't work well together,I usually blow the budget half way through the build :suicide:
I know that one!
For some reason, my budget always turns out to be the low end of the project cost......
Belgian1979vette
Well-known member
The production of power is a function of rpm. If you have not enough low end torque you can always install a shorter rear axle ratio and have more torque low down where needed (or a trans with a deeper first)
